Recently, the renowned media outlet The New York Times sent a cease-and-desist letter to Perplexity, an AI startup, demanding the company to stop using its content.
This news was first reported by The Wall Street Journal, garnering widespread attention. In fact, this is not the first time The New York Times has clashed with AI companies over content usage issues.
Last year, the newspaper filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, accusing it of illegally using a large number of articles in training AI models. Although OpenAI insisted that its use of the content fell under the legal category of "fair use," to avoid legal disputes, OpenAI began to reach cooperation agreements with several major media outlets, attempting to obtain content through legal means.
Perplexity's AI service differs from the popular ChatGPT chatbot. Perplexity is essentially an "answer engine," with functionalities closer to traditional search engines, providing users with quick and accurate information responses through AI technology. While such services are convenient for users, they have also sparked concerns among content creators, who are starting to worry about their works being used without authorization.
In today's digital era, content copyright issues have become particularly important. With the rapid development of AI technology, how to protect creators' rights and ensure the lawful use of content has become an urgent issue to address. It is foreseeable that more media and tech companies will engage in battles in this field in the future, and finding a balance point will be a matter that all stakeholders need to seriously consider.
Key Points:
🌐 The New York Times issued a cease-and-desist order to AI company Perplexity, demanding it to stop using its content.
⚖️ Previously, the newspaper had sued OpenAI for allegedly using a large number of articles without authorization.
🔍 Perplexity's "answer engine" service has sparked a new round of discussions about content copyright.