Recently, the social media platform Bluesky faced a significant data scraping incident. A machine learning librarian, Daniel van Strien, scraped over one million public user posts from Bluesky's API and uploaded this data to the AI company Hugging Face. The dataset includes users' Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) and a range of features to search for specific user content.

Recently, the Southern District Court of New York dismissed the copyright infringement lawsuit against OpenAI filed by Raw Story Media, Inc. and AlterNet Media, Inc., stating that the case lacked standing. This ruling marks an important victory for OpenAI in the legal disputes between AI and copyright, providing a reference for handling similar cases in the future. Raw Story and AlterNet are two online news outlets primarily focused on leftist perspectives.

The Claude team has caused a major uproar due to their large-scale, unauthorized data scraping activities. Their crawler accessed the iFixit servers one million times within 24 hours, scraping a significant amount of website content, leading to severe resource strain on the servers, which triggered strong dissatisfaction from both the affected company and the public. iFixit explicitly prohibits data scraping on their website, yet the Claude team's actions disregarded these rules, resulting in months of illegal access to the site. This incident not only disrupted iFixit's normal operations but also impacted other entities reliant on website content.

European data protection regulators are investigating Elon Musk's X platform for allegedly using user data for its AI startup xAI without explicit consent. Users have reported that their posts and interactions with the Grok chatbot were used for AI training. The Irish Data Protection Commission has sent inquiries to X regarding user transparency and may investigate potential GDPR violations, raising concerns about possible fines or penalties. X h....

Google strongly refutes the AI copyright lawsuit, insisting that 'using public information for learning is not theft'. The lawsuit involves AI infringing on privacy and property rights, and Google claims the allegations are unfounded. U.S. law supports the use of public information for new purposes, and Google firmly believes in its legality.