Peer reviews have found that content generated by models like ChatGPT accounted for up to 17% in top AI conferences during 2023-2024. Heavy AI-generated content reviews often occur near deadlines, with comments lacking academic citations and reviewer engagement. The research raises questions about whether to disclose AI involvement in reviews, how to incentivize good practices, and how to maintain knowledge diversity. The rapid growth of artificial intelligence impacts scientific quality control, necessitating a re-evaluation of credit in hybrid knowledge work.