YouTube is developing new tools to help creators manage and protect their voices and images, especially in the context of generative AI. The new tools include 'Synthetic Singing Recognition Technology' aimed at automatically detecting content that uses generative AI to mimic creators' singing voices. This technology will be integrated into YouTube's copyright identification system, with pilot testing planned for next year. Additionally, YouTube is also developing another technology to recognize deepfake videos to protect creators' images. In order to prevent unauthorized YouTube...

With the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, ensuring that the works of content creators are not illegally used has become a global concern. Recently, a group of bipartisan senators in the US Senate proposed a new bill called the COPIED Act, aiming to simplify the verification and detection of AI-generated content, and to protect journalists and artists from unauthorized use by AI models.Image Source Note: The image was generated by AI, provided by the image licensing servic

60% of GPT-3.5 outputs have plagiarism issues. A Copyleaks report indicates that 60% of outputs exhibit plagiarism. GPT-3.5 shows different similarity scores across various subjects. The plagiarism issue has led to legal disputes between OpenAI and The New York Times.

Plagiarism detection company Copyleaks released a report stating that 60% of the output generated by the GPT-3.5 model contains some form of plagiarized content. Copyleaks uses a proprietary scoring method that considers factors such as text similarity, minor alterations, and paraphrasing to calculate a 'similarity score.' The highest similarity scores were found in fields like computer science, physics, and psychology, while the lowest were in drama, humanities, and English. OpenAI has stated that it has taken measures to limit inadvertent memory usage, and its terms also prohibit deliberate reverse-engineering of content. Aside from the New York Times lawsuit, creators are also attempting to assert rights regarding AI training.

Musk's xAI company released the AI robot Grok, which allegedly cited OpenAI policies in some of its responses. xAI engineers stated this was due to unintentionally acquiring ChatGPT outputs as training data, but experts are suspicious whether Grok was trained by fine-tuning the ChatGPT model outputs. Grok is designed to be more 'rebellious' and can answer various sharp and sensitive questions. Grok performed exceptionally well, surpassing several other AI models of similar scale in tests.

🛡️ Artists use the Kudurru tool to fight against AI web crawlers by sending false images to protect their works. 🌐 Kudurru is web-based and blocks web crawlers or sends misleading images. 🔒 Solutions are limited, calling for government intervention to ensure that AI training does not misuse artists' works.

A writer discovered that their memoir was plagiarized by AI and sold on Amazon. The controversy arises as Amazon recommends the plagiarized book to readers. Amazon faces issues with the listing of AI-generated books. The Writers' Association calls for the labeling of AI-generated content, while Amazon states it will remove books that do not comply with content guidelines.

MSN released an AI-generated article concerning former NBA player Brandon Hunter, which sparked controversy. The article was accused of plagiarizing from TMZ Sports blog and was described as incoherent, produced by Race Track Publications. Despite MSN removing the controversial article, Race Track continues to publish incomprehensible content, leaving the issue unresolved. This is not the first instance of MSN publishing AI-generated content, raising discussions about content moderation. The issue of content moderation needs urgent attention to prevent the further spread of meaningless AI-generated articles.

Researchers have found that 37 websites appear to use AI to 'copy' stories from mainstream publications and republish them to earn advertising revenue. These plagiarism websites seem to be fully automated, with no human involvement. Traditional news publishers are struggling to cope with the impact of AI on the news industry, and some publishers are beginning to consider suing AI companies.