James Earl Jones, the legendary actor known for his iconic voice and a remarkable career spanning over sixty years, is well-remembered for his roles as Mufasa in 'The Lion King' and Darth Vader in the 'Star Wars' series. Jones, a Tony Award winner for 'The Great White Hope' and 'Fences', had his voice replicated through AI technology to recreate classic characters, raising discussions within the industry regarding the use of AI and the rights of voice actors. This decision has led to a strike initiated by SAG-AFTRA performers, concerned about the potential for AI to replace their jobs.

Recently, Wired magazine reported that Apple's content-scraping bot, Applebot, has faced collective resistance from multiple major media outlets, including well-known platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, The New York Times, and The Financial Times, which have chosen to block Applebot and deny it access to their website content. This phenomenon reflects the complex situation in the field of AI content scraping and the media industry's complicated attitude towards AI technology. Research shows that approximately 6% to 7% of websites have blocked Applebot, while up to

The AI chatbot Claude from Anthropic has recently come under scrutiny due to user feedback suggesting a decline in performance, including reduced memory and deteriorating coding abilities. A post on Reddit claimed that Claude's intelligence level seems to have decreased. In response, Anthropic executive Alex Albert stated that the company's investigation found no widespread issues and confirmed that no changes had been made to Claude's model or reasoning pipeline. To increase transparency, the company has released the system prompts for the Claude model.

AI face-swapping technology, known as Deepfake, has gradually become widespread against the backdrop of rapid technological advancement, attracting significant attention. A strikingly realistic live stream video of Musk has sparked heated discussions online, drawing a large audience and revealing the potential and risks of the technology. Deepfake technology is not only used for live streams but can also create highly realistic social media videos, such as a fake Musk TikTok account, which has garnered an impressive number of likes and shares, making it hard to distinguish truth from falsehood. However, the application of this technology has also led to a series of issues, particularly the increased risk of telecommunication fraud.

CodeRabbit is working to significantly reduce the time and effort involved in code review through artificial intelligence to enhance code quality. The company's co-founder and CEO Harjot Gill claims that by utilizing 'advanced AI reasoning' to understand code intent, their platform can provide developers with 'human-like' feedback, greatly automating the code review process. However, Gill's claim is met with skepticism as there is evidence suggesting that AI-driven code reviews may lack the accuracy of human-involved reviews.

A scandal has recently emerged in Wyoming involving a journalist who resigned after using artificial intelligence to fabricate quotes and stories. Local journalist CJ Baker exposed that quotes from the Wyoming governor and local district attorney were questionable, and the sentences in the article appeared mechanical. This incident began with a report about comedian Larry Cable Guy being selected as the grand marshal of the Cody Stampede Parade. After meeting with the journalist Aaron Percha, he admitted to using AI and resigned shortly thereafter. The publisher and editor have expressed their apologies and committed to developing AI guidelines.

The application of artificial intelligence in job recruitment aims to improve objectivity and efficiency, but studies reveal its potential to exacerbate bias. AI learns from data, and biases in datasets can lead to unfair algorithmic outcomes. The educational and professional gaps between HR and AI developers hinder effective collaboration, impacting the ability to identify and reduce biases. To address this issue, it is recommended to implement structured training programs to enhance HR professionals' knowledge of AI; promote interdisciplinary teamwork to ensure datasets are diverse and represent different groups; and establish guidelines and ethics.

Behind the rapid development of artificial intelligence, some tech giants have quietly resorted to controversial means. They have not only "drained" books, websites, photos, and social media posts, but also, without the creators' knowledge, extensively used YouTube videos to train their AI models. Who's Touching My Videos? According to an investigation by Proof News, Silicon Valley giants including Anthropic, NVIDIA, Apple, and Salesforce used subtitle data from 173,536 YouTube videos to train A

As AIGC technology showcases its capabilities in the 'Global AI Film Marathon', the AI short film 'Waves of War' has sparked a copyright controversy due to its similarities to 'Dune'. This discussion not only raises questions about the originality of AI-generated content but also reveals potential copyright issues involved in the AI creative process.

Under Armour's new advertisement has sparked intense discussions in the industry, claiming to utilize various AI technologies. The ad has faced backlash from creators for allegedly using their works without authorization, leading to a copyright controversy. The application of AI technology in the creative field is still exploratory, and a more comprehensive regulatory framework needs to be established. The company's use of AI to reduce production costs has raised concerns, highlighting the need to respect creators' labor. While AI technology offers efficient creative possibilities, it is crucial to avoid plagiarism and infringement risks.

["Over 24 hours since the launch of Claude 3, it continues to reshape people's perceptions.", "Netizens believe that Claude 3 behaves as if it has a 'coherent subject' existence, unlike other large models.", "Some OpenAI users suggest that if Claude continues to showcase its capabilities, it might push OpenAI to release its next-generation model.", "Jimmy Apples releases the latest news, indicating that OpenAI's risk/reward assessment regarding the release of the next-generation model may be influenced by Claude 3."]

Some legal experts believe that AI outputs should be protected under the First Amendment. Legal expert Peter Salib warns that this viewpoint could have serious consequences. Regulation of AI outputs may face challenges, leading to potential dangers. Salib advocates for regulations specifically on AI outputs to mitigate risks.

["OpenAI claims that The New York Times hired hackers to attack ChatGPT","OpenAI argues that the hiring of hackers by The New York Times is critical","The New York Times used prompts to attack ChatGPT","OpenAI retaliates against blatant violations of product usage terms","AI companies face a copyright lawsuit crisis similar to Google's","Internet companies selling data to AI companies","Proposal for the latest data selection research framework","AI-generated content accelerates its spread across the Internet","Large models admit to using AI-generated data"]

After Sora's launch, many self-media operators introduced paid courses related to Sora, priced from 50 yuan to 999 yuan, claiming to teach Sora usage techniques and provide creative materials. However, Sora has not been opened to the public. Li Yizhou and other internet celebrities, who claimed to be Tsinghua PhDs, allegedly dissolved their paid group without refunds. Meta scientist Yang Likun questioned Sora's video generation route, declaring it destined to fail. Industry insiders believe that some courses exploit information asymmetry, taking advantage of people's naivety and collecting 'intelligence tax'.

The video generation field is chaotic, with genuine videos being impersonated, leading to concerns over the authenticity of Will Smith's clarification video. The suspected generation by Sora has caused distress. The release of Sora has triggered a sensation, with authenticity issues making it difficult to discern the realism of the AI model. The challenge of distinguishing between the real and the fake becomes increasingly complex.

The Sora generative video model has recently sparked significant discussion, with reports claiming that one of its inventors is Xie Saining, a young scientist who graduated from Shanghai Jiao Tong University. Xie Saining responded on social media, denying any connection to Sora and stating that he has no association with the project. He emphasized that for complex systems like Sora, talent is the most important factor, followed by data and then computational power. He also mentioned that before AI regulation and technological maturity, simply generating beautiful images is not enough; capturing the truth is essential, much like what is described in 'Black Mirror.'

Selkie's Valentine's Day collection, designed using the generative AI Midjourney, sparked controversy with some users claiming that using AI for design is unethical and exploits artists. The founder of Selkie stated that AI is a tool that can enhance efficiency, but she indicated that it will not continue to be used for generating images in the Selkie brand. This controversy highlights the complex relationship between art and AI.

The launch of GPT-4 features multimodal capabilities surpassing its predecessors, leading AI technology development. Baidu introduces Wenxin Yiyan, initiating the domestic multimodal competition with a user base exceeding 100 million. AI Sun Yanzi emerges, triggering controversies over AI music synthesis and copyright. Maoyake Camera launches, sweeping social media and igniting a trend in AI photography products. The state releases 'Interim Measures for the Management of Generative Artificial Intelligence Services' to regulate the AIGC industry.

The leak of the artist database used to train Midjourney AI includes renowned artists such as Banksy and David Hockney, leading to criticism on social media. The leak involves over 16,000 artists and has sparked copyright lawsuits. Midjourney's CEO confirmed the use of names from more than 4,000 artists for AI training.

The latest update of Midjourney's V6 version has led to user complaints about generated artwork being similar to known copyrighted pieces. Artist Reid Southen discovered that the generated images resembled scenes from several movies and was subsequently banned by Midjourney. AI researcher Gary Marcus expressed concern, speculating that high-resolution copyrighted images may have been used, with the company not responding to the allegations. In response to the criticism, Midjourney banned Southen and revised their terms of service, emphasizing the importance of not infringing intellectual property rights. Artists have accused AI-generated content...