The European Union recently released a draft of guidelines for the behavior of General-Purpose AI (GPAI) models, aimed at providing companies with a framework to comply and avoid hefty fines. The document is set to be finalized in May and outlines risk management guidelines, offering a blueprint for compliance and avoidance of significant penalties. GPAI refers to AI that has been trained with a total computational power exceeding 10²⁵ FLOP. Companies expected to be bound by the EU guidelines include OpenAI, Google, Meta, Anthropic, and Mistral.

Singapore has recently announced a series of important measures in cybersecurity, particularly regarding safety guidelines for Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems and legislation banning the use of deepfake technology in election advertising. These initiatives aim to help organizations mitigate potential risks during the development and deployment of AI, ensuring the security of the technology. Image Credit: The image is generated by AI and licensed through Midjourney. The 'AI System Security Guidelines' launched by the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore (CSA) emphasize the concept of 'security by design.'

In Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil, G20 leaders reached an important consensus this Friday, deciding to work together to combat misinformation and establish guidelines for the future development of artificial intelligence. This is the first time in G20 history that the issue of misinformation has been explicitly acknowledged, calling on digital platforms to enhance transparency and accountability. Source Note: Image generated by AI, image licensed from provider Midjourney. João Brant, Digital Policy Secretary under Brazilian President Lula, stated in an interview with the Associated Press that G20 representatives emphasized the importance of digital platforms.

Recently, with the dual Hollywood strikes, the film industry has widely focused on the application of artificial intelligence. Documentary filmmakers are faced with numerous ethical issues during this transformation, particularly regarding how to use generative AI and how to navigate the boundaries of 'fictional material' in their creations. In response, a group of documentary producers has joined forces to release a brand new set of ethical guidelines to help producers, filmmakers, and major platforms address the challenges posed by this technology. Image source note: Image generated by AI, image licensed by Midjourney.

The Debrief reported on a study regarding the AI image platform Midjourney, which found that the platform inadvertently generated inappropriate content, violating its own usage guidelines. Researchers discovered vulnerabilities in Midjourney's NSFW filtering system that allowed users to circumvent content restrictions. The article revealed that Midjourney Version 6 appears to have relaxed filtering of nude images, raising concerns. The images created by Midjourney were not requested and could present significant inconsistencies.

Attorneys must not input client confidential information and ensure providers do not share or misuse data. Lawyers need to have a deep understanding of generative AI solutions and review outputs to protect client interests. California is leading the way in establishing regulations, while other state bar associations are also developing guidelines for the use of AI. AI in the legal field may require certification to ensure the confidentiality of inputs and outputs and compliance with regulations.

The UK's National Cyber Security Centre, the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and international organizations from 16 other countries have published a new guideline on the security of artificial intelligence systems. These 'Guidelines for Developing Secure AI Systems' aim to provide developers with guidance to ensure that security remains a core component throughout the design, development, deployment, and operation of AI systems. This new guideline has been recognized and jointly signed by 21 agencies and ministries from 18 countries, including the US National Security Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as well as Canada's cybersecurity.

🌐 The Japanese government has established AI guidelines aimed at reducing excessive reliance on AI technology and addressing data bias issues. 📜 The government will finalize the guidelines by the end of the year, which will include 10 fundamental principles to ensure that AI companies adhere to fairness, transparency, and human rights protection principles. 🤖 AI developers, service providers, and users will share responsibility, with developers required to ensure data accuracy and prevent unauthorized access.

Recent studies indicate that ChatGPT may outperform doctors in adhering to depression treatment standards, eliminating gender and social class biases. The research, published in the journal 'Family Medicine and Community Health', compares ChatGPT's performance with that of French doctors. In mild cases, ChatGPT demonstrated higher accuracy, providing recommendations that align with clinical guidelines. Despite its potential, researchers emphasize that AI should not replace human clinical judgment, raising ethical and moral concerns.

A Deloitte survey shows that 74% of companies are testing generative AI, and 65% are using AI internally. 56% of respondents are concerned that their companies lack ethical guidelines for AI. Issues related to data privacy, transparency, and intellectual property have raised concerns. Ethical violations could lead to reputational damage and regulatory penalties.

As the G7 presidency, Japan will take the lead in formulating guidelines for generative AI. The IGF Internet Governance Forum will convene in Kyoto to discuss AI regulation and other related topics. The outcomes of these discussions will be applied to Japan's Hiroshima AI Process. The G7 will establish a code of conduct for generative AI developers, which will require the disclosure of system information and mandate the use of digital watermarks to identify AI-generated content.

The Japanese government has drafted AI guidelines requiring algorithm developers, service implementers, and companies using AI to share responsibility. The guidelines prohibit the use of AI for infringing human rights or engaging in terrorism. They require management to pay attention to the risks that AI may pose and to develop AI policies. The guidelines emphasize the innovation of AI technology and the enhancement of AI competence.

UNESCO's guidelines for the educational use of generative AI call for a human-centered approach that considers content accuracy, appropriate age, reasonable application, cultural values, and teacher training. The rapid deployment of generative AI in education raises concerns, and these guidelines aim to protect learners' interests while promoting safe and transparent use of generative AI.

Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences has released a guide for the use of artificial intelligence in the classroom. The guide advises instructors to clearly communicate course policies and provides three different policy options. The college emphasizes the protection of data privacy and does not encourage the use of AI detection tools.

{"Point 1":"Salesforce has released AI usage guidelines that explicitly prohibit the use of AI products for purposes such as weapon development and adult content.","Point 2":"The policy applies to all services under Salesforce, including the Einstein platform.","Point 3":"Salesforce executives suggest that companies should enhance employee skills in generative AI and build trustworthy infrastructure."}

The Associated Press has released guidelines for the use of artificial intelligence, urging journalists to use the technology cautiously. The AP emphasizes that AI should not replace journalists, but rather serve as an auxiliary tool. The New York Times has limited the scope of using its data to train AI models and has withdrawn from a coalition negotiating with AI companies regarding training data.